2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study using water atomized and gas atomized powder in laser powder bed fusion – Assessment of the fatigue performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, five different Fe conditions were investigated. Further details on all materials considered are provided in previous works [27,[29][30][31][32]. All conditions experienced very distinctive thermal and mechanical histories.…”
Section: Raw Materials and Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, five different Fe conditions were investigated. Further details on all materials considered are provided in previous works [27,[29][30][31][32]. All conditions experienced very distinctive thermal and mechanical histories.…”
Section: Raw Materials and Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that these differences lead to different microstructural and mechanical properties [29]. Furthermore, for the sake of direct comparison, the GA powder as well as the WA powder were processed using the same PBF-LB/M parameters [27]. In PB-AM, several factors can highly impact the material's final appearance, as will be discussed in this work.…”
Section: Raw Materials and Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations