Proceedings of 10th World Congress on Computational Mechanics 2014
DOI: 10.5151/meceng-wccm2012-18598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study Using Shuffled Complex Evolution and Differential Evolution Applied to Robotic Manipulator Design

Abstract: Abstract. In last decades, evolutionary approaches has been used extensively and demons-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCE algorithm has been successfully applied to a broad range of optimization problems, such as: calibrating rainfall-runoff models (Kuczera, 1997;Franchini et al, 1998;Muttil and Liong, 2004); formulation and solution of a multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models (Yapo et al, 1998); multi-objective auto-calibration for semi-distributed water quality models (van Griensven and Bauwens, 2003); optimal design ow water distribution network (Liong and Atiquzzaman, 2004), discrete optimization problems by using a hybridization between SCE and Frog Leaping algorithm (Eusuff et al, 2006); calibration of conceptual watershed models (Duan et al, 1994;Tang and Luan, 2007); a comparison between SCE and Differential Evolution (Storn and Price, 1997;Price et al, 2005) to robotic manipulator design (Brandão et al, 2014); hydrologic models (Naeini et al, 2019); solution of reservoir scheduling problems using SCE and Stochastic Ranking procedure (Mao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SCE algorithm has been successfully applied to a broad range of optimization problems, such as: calibrating rainfall-runoff models (Kuczera, 1997;Franchini et al, 1998;Muttil and Liong, 2004); formulation and solution of a multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models (Yapo et al, 1998); multi-objective auto-calibration for semi-distributed water quality models (van Griensven and Bauwens, 2003); optimal design ow water distribution network (Liong and Atiquzzaman, 2004), discrete optimization problems by using a hybridization between SCE and Frog Leaping algorithm (Eusuff et al, 2006); calibration of conceptual watershed models (Duan et al, 1994;Tang and Luan, 2007); a comparison between SCE and Differential Evolution (Storn and Price, 1997;Price et al, 2005) to robotic manipulator design (Brandão et al, 2014); hydrologic models (Naeini et al, 2019); solution of reservoir scheduling problems using SCE and Stochastic Ranking procedure (Mao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1994; Tang and Luan, 2007); a comparison between SCE and Differential Evolution (Storn and Price, 1997; Price et al. , 2005) to robotic manipulator design (Brandão et al. , 2014); hydrologic models (Naeini et al.…”
Section: Shuffled Complex Evolution Its Extension For Multi-objective...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], a simplified scheme for the optimal design of the robot manipulator is solved by the Differential Evolution and Shuffled Complex Evolution optimization methods.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É importante mencionar que parte dos resultados expostos nas Tabs. 5.12 e 5.13 foram apresentados por BRANDÃO et al (2012) no World Congress on Computational Mechanics.…”
Section: Simulação Numérica Do Problema Irrestritounclassified