2020
DOI: 10.36348/sjmps.2020.v06i04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study to Evaluate Visual Outcome in Post-Operative Patients of Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Similar results were found in a study by Ashok Rathi et al as there was no statistically significant difference between the MSICS & Phacoemulsification in terms of BCVA at post-operative 1 month. 16 In our study, there was no significant difference in mean astigmatism between both the groups during preoperative period. The mean postoperative astigmatism at six weeks in Group 1 was 0.154±0.22D and 0.32±0.34D in Group 2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…11 Similar results were found in a study by Ashok Rathi et al as there was no statistically significant difference between the MSICS & Phacoemulsification in terms of BCVA at post-operative 1 month. 16 In our study, there was no significant difference in mean astigmatism between both the groups during preoperative period. The mean postoperative astigmatism at six weeks in Group 1 was 0.154±0.22D and 0.32±0.34D in Group 2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Fernanda et al, also found that the relationship between sex and the incidence of cataracts was statistically significant (p= <0.05). Different results were found in Rathi et al [4] it was said that there was no significant difference between sex with cataract incidence. The study of Rathi et al [5] was had the same result from Ahmed's research that there is no difference between gender and age of patients with cataract incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Fernanda et al, also found a statistically significant relationship between age and cataract incidence (p= <0.05) [2]. Rathi et al [4] found that the average age of patients in their study was 63.01 years old and there was no significant difference between the incidence of cataracts and the age of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These studies were in consistence with our study wherein there was a significant difference between various 2 groups in terms of distribution of Vision Category in first week. In a study by Rathi A et al [15] participants in the Group: Phacoemulsification had the better proportion of Vision Category (Post-Operative Day-7) 6/18 or better on 7th postoperative day compared to MSICS group due the difference in the size of the incision and induced astigmatism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%