2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on tool wear and laminate damage in drilling of carbon-fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
62
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The delamination is inferred from the ratio of the maximum diameter (D max ) with the nominal diameter (D nom ) of the hole as equation (1). 29 The maximum diameter is calculated by double distance from the center of the nominal hole to the furthest point extension. The nominal diameter and the tool diameter are similar…”
Section: Quality Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delamination is inferred from the ratio of the maximum diameter (D max ) with the nominal diameter (D nom ) of the hole as equation (1). 29 The maximum diameter is calculated by double distance from the center of the nominal hole to the furthest point extension. The nominal diameter and the tool diameter are similar…”
Section: Quality Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case improper machining technology is applied when machining CFRPs, many micro-and macro-geometrical damages can be generated easily: such damages include delamination [6,7,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], uncut fibres and pull-outs [13,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] as well as microcracks on the machined surfaces [30,[32][33][34]. In order to minimize the above-listed damages, there are many process and technological parameters that have to be optimized including (i) the geometry and coating of the cutting tool [18,33]; (ii) the cutting speed, feed rate and the depth of cut [7,18,35]; (iii) the tool path [7,13,32]; (iv) the cooling [36][37][38][39]; and (v) the type of support plate [40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, the conventional cutting tools is usually not the best choice to machining good quality features in CFRPs unless using some certain methods. A effective approach to improve machining quality is that making the single cutting thickness in the reasonable range [8,9]. On the other hand, applying internal coolant holes at speci c position and using minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), the tool wear is also effectively reduced and hole surface quality is greatly improved [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%