2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on three reactor types for methanol synthesis from syngas and CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This heat accumulation was recently studied by Cui et al by comparing three fixed bed reactor types (the adiabatic, water-cooled and gas-cooled reactor). 280 The simulation results showed that in the adiabatic and the gas-cooled reactor the hot spot temperatures inside the system can be within the typical operating temperature range for the catalyst and only the water-cooled system showed advantages in terms of efficient heat removal. Finally, when looking at ASPEN process simulations, a similar trend is again observed [281][282][283][284][285][286][287] with most of the works being done in the methanol pathway field, 281-285 probably owing to the easier downstream separation of this process.…”
Section: Process Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This heat accumulation was recently studied by Cui et al by comparing three fixed bed reactor types (the adiabatic, water-cooled and gas-cooled reactor). 280 The simulation results showed that in the adiabatic and the gas-cooled reactor the hot spot temperatures inside the system can be within the typical operating temperature range for the catalyst and only the water-cooled system showed advantages in terms of efficient heat removal. Finally, when looking at ASPEN process simulations, a similar trend is again observed [281][282][283][284][285][286][287] with most of the works being done in the methanol pathway field, 281-285 probably owing to the easier downstream separation of this process.…”
Section: Process Design Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some of the most commonly used kinetic models for methanol synthesis are the models provided by Graaf 13,[34][35][36][37] and Vanden Bussche and Froment. 15,[38][39][40][41] Graaf's kinetic model is based on the stepwise hydration of CO and CO 2 with the rate determining step (rds) determined by an error discussion of the 48 possible combinations of rds of COhydrogenation, CO 2 -hydrogenation and reverse WGS (rWGS). 13,42,43 In contrast to the mechanism applied by Graaf, Bussche and Froment considered a different reaction mechanism based only on CO 2 -hydrogenation coupled with rWGS via the formyl species.…”
Section: Reaction Chemistry and Engineering Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our recent study has shown that the incorporation of Ga into MnO x significantly enhanced the dissociation ability of H 2 , and the prepared MnGa oxide exhibited a high C 2 –C 4 = olefin selectivity of 88.3% at a CO conversion of 13.7% . The conversion of intermediate such as methanol or ketene to C 2 –C 4 = olefin over SAPO-34 requires a high temperature (400–450 °C), while the traditional methanol synthesis from syngas works at low temperatures (200–350 °C) . Thus, the bifunctional catalyst should be developed to match the reaction temperature of intermediate production and transformation to further improve the catalytic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%