2014 Oceans - St. John's 2014
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2014.7003023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on the performances of the DF techniques using a single acoustic vector sensor

Abstract: Underwater acoustic vector sensors (AVS) are devices which can measure scalar pressure and three dimensional acceleration or particle velocity with only one sensor. Direction of an acoustic target can be estimated by these four measured scalar values. Techniques based on either closed-form expressions or beamforming can be carried out for direction finding by using the axial projections of the gradient vector of the pressure from the target. In this work, the performances of direction of arrival (DOA) estimati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performances of computationally efficient and relatively simple DOA estimation algorithms, namely, arctanbased method, intensity-based (IB) technique, time domain beamforming (TDBF), and frequency domain beamforming (FDBF), are investigated. The discussion in [21] presents a detailed theoretical comparison of these algorithms for a single AVS with error sources such as imperfect sensitivity patterns and ambient noise. In this study, the algorithms are analyzed and compared using practical measurement data obtained in our shallow water experiments at Bilkent Pond.…”
Section: Doa Estimation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performances of computationally efficient and relatively simple DOA estimation algorithms, namely, arctanbased method, intensity-based (IB) technique, time domain beamforming (TDBF), and frequency domain beamforming (FDBF), are investigated. The discussion in [21] presents a detailed theoretical comparison of these algorithms for a single AVS with error sources such as imperfect sensitivity patterns and ambient noise. In this study, the algorithms are analyzed and compared using practical measurement data obtained in our shallow water experiments at Bilkent Pond.…”
Section: Doa Estimation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study is to investigate and compare the performances of computationally efficient and relatively simple DOA estimation algorithms, namely, based method, intensity-based (IB) technique, time domain beamforming (TDBF), and frequency domain beamforming (FDBF), in a shallow water environment. These algorithms are selected according to our previous analysis [21] in which we compare the performances of DOA estimation techniques for a single underwater AVS under the effects of various error sources such as imperfect sensitivity patterns and ambient noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%