2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2015.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on the performance of Kesterite based thin film solar cells using SCAPS simulation program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1, input parameters are illustrated for the reference. To avoid the complexity of interface defects at absorber/back contact, absorber/buffer, and buffer/window, we adopted the basic input parameters from literature, theories, or reasonable estimates [13][14][15][16]. …”
Section: Experminetal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 1, input parameters are illustrated for the reference. To avoid the complexity of interface defects at absorber/back contact, absorber/buffer, and buffer/window, we adopted the basic input parameters from literature, theories, or reasonable estimates [13][14][15][16]. …”
Section: Experminetal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we focus on main effects in quantum efficiency when a thin defective interface layer between CdS and CZTSSe is added in this study. [12][13][14][15]. For this simulation study, we insert the thin 5 nm defective interface layer between CdS and CZTSSe as a representation of the interface or near-interface defects.…”
Section: Trends By Various Interface Defect Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows ZnO:Al, ZnO and CdS material parameters used in the simulation which were selected based on experimental values reported on literature and theory. These parameters have been broadly used for modeling CIGS, CdTe and kesterite solar cells [23,25,26,[28][29][30][31]. On the other hand, most CZTS material properties used in the simulation were taken from the electrical and optical characterization results reported for CZTS-based solar cells with record efficiencies [1,32].…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a conduction band-offset (DE C ) of 0.24 eV was taken into consideration as measured for CdS/CZTS heterojunction [10]. Moreover, a relative dielectric permittivity value of 10 was considered for CZTS compound as reported elsewhere [26,[28][29][30]34]. CZTS electron and hole effective masses were used to calculate the effective density of states of the conduction band (N c ) and the valence band (N v ).…”
Section: Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a recent significant improvement in Kesterite solar cells, one of the most fundamental problems that remain is lower Voc [14][15][16][17]. Moving Voc beyond 750 mV in Kesterite solar cells requires improvements in both built-in voltage and recombination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%