A comparative study on stub columns with various steel grades subjected to concentric axial loading

Lee, Kangmin; Lee, Myoung-Jae; Oh, Young-Suk; Yang, Yang; Oh, Keunyeong

doi:10.1007/s13296-015-3007-3

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Test data on high strength steel stub columns have been collected and carefully analysed in this section to assess the suitability of the Class 3 [5] limit for internal elements in compression. Figure 13 compares the EN 1993-1-1 Class 3 limit for internal elements in compression (c/tε = 42) with the results of stub column test on high strength steels from this study and those collected from the literature [11][12][13][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Stub column test data on lower steel grades, with nominal yield strength between 260 N/mm 2 and 450 N/mm 2 , from [13,49,[53][54][55][56] have also been presented in Figure 13 for comparison purposes.…”

Section: Assessment Of Eurocode Class 3 Slenderness Limits For Internmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material properties and compressive local buckling response of high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections

Wang

Afshan

Schillo

et al. 2017

Engineering Structures

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experimental investigation into the structural performance of compressed high strength steel (HSS) square and rectangular hollow sections is described in this paper. Both hot-rolled and cold-formed HSS sections were examined. In total six S460NH and five S690QH hot-rolled section sizes and three S500MC, two S700MC and four S960QC cold-formed section sizes were tested. The experimental programme comprised tensile coupon tests on flat and corner material, measurements of geometric imperfections, full cross-section tensile tests and stub column tests. The results of the experiments presented in this paper have been combined with other available test data on high strength steel sections, and used to assess the existing design guidelines for high strength steels given in Eurocode 3. The focus has been on the material ductility requirements, the Class 3 slenderness limit for internal elements in compression and the effective width formula for Class 4 internal elements in compression.Reliability assessments of the Class 3 slenderness limit (both the current value of 42 and a proposed value of 38) and the effective width formula for Class 4 internal elements in compression were carried out. The analysis indicated that, based on the assembled test data considered in this study, and the assumptions made regarding the statistical distributions of material and geometric properties, a partial safety factor greater than unity is required for HSS. Similar findings have also recently been presented for ordinary strength steels.

show abstract

Section: Assessment Of Eurocode Class 3 Slenderness Limits For Internmentioning

confidence: 99%

Material properties and compressive local buckling response of high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections

Wang

Afshan

Schillo

et al. 2017

Engineering Structures

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A comparative study on stub columns with various steel grades subjected to concentric axial loading

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

Material properties and compressive local buckling response of high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections

Material properties and compressive local buckling response of high strength steel square and rectangular hollow sections

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About