2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2224/1/012001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on Part-of-Speech Taggers’ Performance on Examination Questions Classification According to Bloom’s Taxonomy

Abstract: Examination questions classification according to Bloom’s Taxonomy uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) approach, a series of text processing approach that generally can divided into the keywords identification stage and then the identified keywords classification to Bloom’s Taxonomy levels stage. Since this NLP approach is a pipeline processes, the keywords identification stage’s performance in term of accuracy is affecting the subsequent stage - the identified keywords classification and subsequently limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper presents a continuous study of the framework proposed by Goh et al [17] for the examination question classifications according to Bloom's taxonomy. We aimed to study the framework of question classifications in order to improve its accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper presents a continuous study of the framework proposed by Goh et al [17] for the examination question classifications according to Bloom's taxonomy. We aimed to study the framework of question classifications in order to improve its accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many POS taggers, such as the TnT POS tagger, ClassifiedBasedPOS tagger, Perceptron POS tagger, and Stanford POS tagger, etc. The Stanford POS tagger was adopted in this module because it generally outperformed other taggers, according to Goh et al [17], Tian and Lo [18] and Go and Nocon [19]. The "English-left3wrods-distsim" and "English-bidirectional-distsim" are two commonly used models for the Stanford POS tagger.…”
Section: Question Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research categorizes questions based on the amount of language information required for classification. Comparison experiments demonstrate the impact of various DL models on question categorization [66][67][68][69][70]. Deep transfer learning is employed to enhance question categorization, even in new domains.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NLTK's default Perceptron tagger is employed due to its high accuracy compared to TNT and CRF taggers [21]. State-of-the-art POS tagging with the Penn Treebank dataset achieves an F1 Score of 98.3 [3].…”
Section: Part-of-speech Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%