2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on optical techniques for the estimation of granular flow velocities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many techniques for the non-invasive measurements of granular flow velocities [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], including Particle Image/Tracking Velocimetry (PIV/ PTV), Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), Laser Speckle velocimetry (LSV) and other tomographic methods like Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Among them PIV/ PTV is the most widely used one for the dense granular flow velocity measurement [21][22][23][24]. However, PTV requires that each particle can be distinguished clearly which puts huge demand on image resolution and more importantly computing power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many techniques for the non-invasive measurements of granular flow velocities [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], including Particle Image/Tracking Velocimetry (PIV/ PTV), Laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), Laser Speckle velocimetry (LSV) and other tomographic methods like Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Among them PIV/ PTV is the most widely used one for the dense granular flow velocity measurement [21][22][23][24]. However, PTV requires that each particle can be distinguished clearly which puts huge demand on image resolution and more importantly computing power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in case of PIV there is no requirement to distinguish each particle, large signal-to-noise of recorded images is desirable requiring for example uniform illumination, which is difficult to obtain due to complex interaction of imaging and lighting system with the observed granular flow, and accompanying experimental set-up [20]. LDV is another widely used method for the measurement of solid or fluid velocities with tracer particles [21]. Once again due to high concentration of the particles and resulting strong light scattering it is not suitable for the dense granular flow with only occasional applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber‐optical probes were originally developed in the 1970s and 1980s to measure the velocity of particles in dense multiphase flows . The probe setup consists of a light source and an array of fiber optics to capture the optical image of the particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the existence of light source, PIV and LDV methods can only be applied to transparent fluidized beds, or fluidized beds with glass windows. Besides, velocity measurement can be carried out only on the front-layer particles [37] for LDV method. The optical fiber probe is intrusive, and therefore interferes to some extent with the flow field being measured.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%