2017
DOI: 10.4172/2165-7866.1000209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Classification Models for Activity Recognition

Abstract: Activity Recognition (AR) systems are machine learning models developed for cell-phones and smart wearables to recognize various real-time human activities such as walking, standing, running and biking. In this paper, the performance (accuracy and computational time) of several well-known supervised and unsupervised learning models including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors', Naive Base, 'Decision Tree' and Random Forest are examined on a dataset. It is shown that Random Forest … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Softmax activation function is habitually employed in the output layer of the neural networks aiming at multiclass classification [17]. Therefore, its use in the network developed during the current study makes the classification of the three different types of melanocytic lesions possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Softmax activation function is habitually employed in the output layer of the neural networks aiming at multiclass classification [17]. Therefore, its use in the network developed during the current study makes the classification of the three different types of melanocytic lesions possible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding human activity recognition approaches, most of the related published studies address such a recognition using supervised learning [18][19][20][21][22] or semisupervised learning [23,24]. Transfer learning has also been investigated, whereby the instances or models for activities in one domain can be transferred to improve the recognition accuracy in another domain for the purpose of reducing the need for training data [25][26][27].…”
Section: Activity Recognition-based Supervised Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nabian conducted a comparative study on machine learning classification models for activity recognition [19]. The study used data provided by Baños [20] which consists of body motion recordings from 10 volunteers using sensors placed on the chest, right wrist, and left ankle.…”
Section: Adl Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%