2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.6253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on geographic‐based routing algorithms for flying ad‐hoc networks

Abstract: The advancement of the technology and broad availability of low-cost devices (e.g., networking technology, micro-embedded computers, and sensors, etc.) have opened new ways for the expansion of flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs). The unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have the potential to change their trajectory freely in the case of FANETs. This freedom demands efficient routing to make the network connection smooth. However, designing routing protocols for FANETs is a crucial task for highly dynamic nodes like UA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, there is no investigation into clustering algorithms in this study. In another study, Agrawal et al [33] surveyed the geographic-based routing protocol and presented an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each geographicbased routing protocol, as well as a summary of all comparative analyses of character and quality of service (QoS) metrics of geographic-based routing for FANETs. Nevertheless, it only considered geographically-based techniques, leaving out proactive, reactive, positional, and AI-enabled routing protocol implementations in their various flavors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, there is no investigation into clustering algorithms in this study. In another study, Agrawal et al [33] surveyed the geographic-based routing protocol and presented an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each geographicbased routing protocol, as well as a summary of all comparative analyses of character and quality of service (QoS) metrics of geographic-based routing for FANETs. Nevertheless, it only considered geographically-based techniques, leaving out proactive, reactive, positional, and AI-enabled routing protocol implementations in their various flavors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the topology changes have little impact on this approach. 15,16 Moreover, one of the key issues with FANETs is the limited energy of UAVs. However, different types of positionbased routing approaches have been proposed in FANETs in the last few years to resolve issues related to UAVs' energy, such as IMRL, 17 EALC, 18 UVAR 19 and eAntHocNet.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons for the existence of connection changes in FANET, such as environmental constraints such as mountains, geographic uncertainty, weather conditions, and so on. [6][7][8] This unique capability of FANET requires an efficient mobility model to transfer the collected data to destinations in sparse networks. To date, there is no mobility model exists today that operates on the sparse FANET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FANET, most applications have a low node density, resulting in network fragmentation. There are several reasons for the existence of connection changes in FANET, such as environmental constraints such as mountains, geographic uncertainty, weather conditions, and so on 6‐8 . This unique capability of FANET requires an efficient mobility model to transfer the collected data to destinations in sparse networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%