2011
DOI: 10.7815/ijorcs.21.2011.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study on Distance Measuring Approaches for Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this program, we have implemented 4 genomic grouping comparison metrics (or dissimilarity measures), each of which are appropriate for different use cases. If the genomic groupings that comprise a given context set are large, we suggest using either “Common Genes – Dice” or “Common Genes – Jaccard” metrics, which implement the set-based Dice and Jaccard dissimilarity approaches [37], with the individual annotated features within each grouping acting as elements and the whole genomic grouping acting as the set. If genomic groupings contain the same annotated features, however vary in the intergenic spacing between features, we recommend using the “Moving Distances” approach, which uses gene order and intergenic spacing to describe differences between contexts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this program, we have implemented 4 genomic grouping comparison metrics (or dissimilarity measures), each of which are appropriate for different use cases. If the genomic groupings that comprise a given context set are large, we suggest using either “Common Genes – Dice” or “Common Genes – Jaccard” metrics, which implement the set-based Dice and Jaccard dissimilarity approaches [37], with the individual annotated features within each grouping acting as elements and the whole genomic grouping acting as the set. If genomic groupings contain the same annotated features, however vary in the intergenic spacing between features, we recommend using the “Moving Distances” approach, which uses gene order and intergenic spacing to describe differences between contexts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the literature on localization methods for WSNs is abundant, proposing novel simple methods that can improve the localization accuracy with low cost is still a research challenge and an important issue for several applications in many domains such as commercial, environmental, health, face recognition, image processing and military domains [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p -distances corresponding to p = 1, p = 2 and p = ∞ are often called City Block, Euclidean and Chebyshev distance, respectively [24]. Thus, we may call ∆ 1 (r, s), ∆ 2 (r, s), and ∆ ∞ (r, s), City Block, Euclidean and Chebyshev similarity functions, respectively.…”
Section: Generalized Similarity Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%