2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study on determination method of heat transfer coefficient using inverse heat transfer and iterative modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. Figure 4a, experimentation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] justifying the method of calculation. As the water near the metal piece is above 100°C, except for the 10 mm square, vapour blanket exists beyond 200 s for other samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. Figure 4a, experimentation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] justifying the method of calculation. As the water near the metal piece is above 100°C, except for the 10 mm square, vapour blanket exists beyond 200 s for other samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, experimentation is time consuming and data for a metal-quenchant combination cannot be applied for the actual workpiece with thickness variations. Arif Sugianto et al [1] studied the determination of quenching technique, to reduce the distortion of steel parts during heat treatment. Temperature dependent heat transfer coefficient was determined for a cylindrical part by lumped heat capacity method and inversion heat transfer method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of heating temperature can be seen from below figures. Results show that for sample temperature of 300°C and also for 500°C the HTC values for surface facing up is higher as compared to surface facing down and side [6] [7] and [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this method, temperature-time curves of the probe are acquired and used to inversely calculate HTC in terms of probe surface temperature (Funatani et al, 1999). This method, called lumped heat capacity method (Sugianto et al, 2008) assumes that the thermal resistance of the probe (body) is negligible in comparison with the resistance of the surrounding environment and therefore its temperature distribution is uniform during quenching. Accordingly, it is usually required to make the probe very small, or in some cases, the probe is made of material with high thermal conductivity like silver (Sugianto et al, 2008) so that the temperature of the probe is uniform during quenching in order to calculate HTC inversely (Sedighi and McMahon, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a better approach to obtain HTC for a real part would need to perform experiments with the actual part, acquire temperature-time curves at different locations of the part, and then iteratively determine the HTC data at different locations from the acquired cooling curves. Recently, some work has been done with such an approach using FEA package ABAQUS and optimization package iSIGHT (Li and Allison, 2007) or FEA package Deform-HT (Sugianto et al, 2008) to determine HTC iteratively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%