2019
DOI: 10.1080/15502287.2018.1520756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Two Different Density Estimation Techniques for Multi-Phase Flow Simulations Using SPH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the SPH form of the gradient of artificial viscosity i  for particle i is expressed as (Suresh et al, 2019b)…”
Section: Artificial Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where the SPH form of the gradient of artificial viscosity i  for particle i is expressed as (Suresh et al, 2019b)…”
Section: Artificial Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Colagrossi and Landrini, 2003). On the other hand, the XSPH modification in section 4.5 with the constant being 0.08   (Suresh et al, 2019a) is used for displacement fields smoothing. The Velocity Verlet algorithm in section 4.1 is adopted.…”
Section: Hydrostatic Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The artificial viscosity,  which is usually utilized in mesh-free methods, e.g. SPH method [46,64], can be adopted in the current PDDO fluid model. Consequently, the momentum equation becomes…”
Section: Artificial Viscosity In Pddo Formmentioning
confidence: 99%