2020
DOI: 10.1142/s0218001421520030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Transfer Learning Approaches for Video Anomaly Detection

Abstract: Recent research has shown that features obtained from pretrained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models can be promptly applied to a variety of problems they were not originally designed to solve. This concept, often referred to as Transfer Learning (TL), is a common practice when labeled data is limited. In some fields, such as video anomaly detection, TL is still an underexplored subject in the sense that it is not clear whether the architecture of the pretrained CNN model impacts on the video anomaly det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, another eight hypotheses on the differences of this G 5 group are statistically significant, as their distance differences are greater than 5.8396 at 90% confidence limit. The performance of the method of AEcaUnet (Ours) is remarkably different than that of Gutoski et al [115], AEcUnet (Ours), Wu0S [98], and AE-Unet (Ours). Nevertheless, the performance of the method of Roy et al [91] is not remarkably different than that of Gutoski et al [115] and AEcUnet (Ours) at a confidence limit of 90%.…”
Section: Average Ranking Of Gcontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, another eight hypotheses on the differences of this G 5 group are statistically significant, as their distance differences are greater than 5.8396 at 90% confidence limit. The performance of the method of AEcaUnet (Ours) is remarkably different than that of Gutoski et al [115], AEcUnet (Ours), Wu0S [98], and AE-Unet (Ours). Nevertheless, the performance of the method of Roy et al [91] is not remarkably different than that of Gutoski et al [115] and AEcUnet (Ours) at a confidence limit of 90%.…”
Section: Average Ranking Of Gcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…From Figure 21, it is noticeable that the hypothesis on the difference of AEcaUnet (Ours) vs. Gutoski et al [115] is statistically significant. Similarly, another eight hypotheses on the differences of this G 5 group are statistically significant, as their distance differences are greater than 5.8396 at 90% confidence limit.…”
Section: Average Ranking Of Gmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The trained DNN is used for extracting features and, next, a new classifier is trained for the specific problem in hand. This approach was proved to be very useful in many computer vision applications [7], [20].…”
Section: B the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep Neural Networks (DNN) have achieved excellent results in solving several complex computer vision problems, for instance: object detection [5], object segmentation [6], anomaly detection in videos [7], people reidentification [8], gender and age recognition [9]. Following this idea, [10] proposed a deep learning model based on convolutional layers followed by LSTM layers to extract spatial and temporal features from videos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following other works in the literature [23,24,27,47], we also used transfer learning to build a model for face mask classification. The base for our approach is the MobileNet-v2 model [48] previously trained with the ImageNet dataset.…”
Section: Face Mask Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%