2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of trabecular bone micro-structural measurements using different CT modalities

Abstract: Osteoporosis, characterized by reduced bone mineral density and micro-architectural degeneration, significantly enhances fracture-risk. There are several viable methods for trabecular bone micro-imaging, which widely vary in terms of technology, reconstruction principle, spatial resolution, and acquisition time. We have performed an excised cadaveric bone specimen study to evaluate different CT-imaging modalities for trabecular bone microstructural analysis. Excised cadaveric bone specimens from the distal rad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Large deviation in CT‐derived modulus values as compared to micro‐CT or mechanical test‐derived results was observed, which suggests that CT‐derived modulus values may not be used as actual modulus measures. Also, our observations on CT‐based computation of Tb microstructural modulus are consistent with our findings related to CT‐ and micro‐CT‐derived values of Tb microstructural metrics and those reported in literature 20,46,47 . Finally, it may be clarified that, since the r values (∈ [0.87 0.90]) are high, it is always possible to use the corresponding regression equation to estimate the reference modulus values from CT‐based FEA‐derived values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large deviation in CT‐derived modulus values as compared to micro‐CT or mechanical test‐derived results was observed, which suggests that CT‐derived modulus values may not be used as actual modulus measures. Also, our observations on CT‐based computation of Tb microstructural modulus are consistent with our findings related to CT‐ and micro‐CT‐derived values of Tb microstructural metrics and those reported in literature 20,46,47 . Finally, it may be clarified that, since the r values (∈ [0.87 0.90]) are high, it is always possible to use the corresponding regression equation to estimate the reference modulus values from CT‐based FEA‐derived values.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also, our observations on CT-based computation of Tb microstructural modulus are consistent with our findings related to CT-and micro-CT-derived values of Tb microstructural metrics and those reported in literature. 20,46,47 Finally, it may be clarified that, since the r values (∈ [0.87 0.90]) are high, it is always possible to use the corresponding regression equation to estimate the reference modulus values from CT-based FEA-derived values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the correlation between Tb.Th and Tb.Sp in the results of Issever et al [ 5 ] was considerably weaker and rare (R 2 = 0.19–0.26), which is consistent with our MDCT image results. Guha [ 6 ] and Chen [ 7 ] explored the correlation between trabecular bone structural measurements of MDCT and the corresponding micro-CT images using in vitro tibial and distal radius specimens. Although the anatomical positions of the study specimens were different, the correlation coefficients of Tb.Th and Tb.Sp was also relatively moderate (R < 0.80, Pearson).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is widely used in the imaging diagnosis of spinal diseases, but it does not allow for accurate measurements of bone microstructure to be determined. Previously published in vitro studies have investigated the feasibility of using MDCT to measure bone structure, with some parameters exhibiting only a moderate correlation with that of micro-CT [ 5 , 6 , 7 ]. The trabecular bone thickness (Tb.Th) is approximately 100 microns, which is far less than the maximum resolution of MDCT images of approximately 200–500 microns [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that we use local maps of Tb.Th and Tb.Sp instead of the customary use of the mean in the analysis of bone specimens, e.g., Guha et al (2020) ; Steiner et al (2020) . The thickness and spacing maps used in the experiments were computed with BoneJ ( Doube et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%