2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of three onshore wind turbine foundation solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the WL above the foundation base reduces the effective weight of the submerged portion of the foundation, reducing the overall vertical load and increasing the eccentricity (Tinjum and Christensen, 2010). The foundation diameter is increased by approximately 15% to 20% when the WL is at the ground surface compared with a WL deep below the surface (Mohamed and Austrell, 2017). In certain soils, cyclic degradation with multiple instances of zero pressure could lead to breakdown of the in situ soil structure and subsequent serviceability problems in the presence of water (Morgan and Ntambakwa, 2008).…”
Section: A) Shallow Foundations: Worldwidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of the WL above the foundation base reduces the effective weight of the submerged portion of the foundation, reducing the overall vertical load and increasing the eccentricity (Tinjum and Christensen, 2010). The foundation diameter is increased by approximately 15% to 20% when the WL is at the ground surface compared with a WL deep below the surface (Mohamed and Austrell, 2017). In certain soils, cyclic degradation with multiple instances of zero pressure could lead to breakdown of the in situ soil structure and subsequent serviceability problems in the presence of water (Morgan and Ntambakwa, 2008).…”
Section: A) Shallow Foundations: Worldwidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to DNV/RisØ (2002), the foundation stability is usually the most decisive factor to determine foundation area, embedment depth and weight. Mohamed and Austrell (2017) noticed that the unit weight of the backfill soil has a significant influence on the foundation stability, especially when the water level is near the ground surface. Foundation sliding is unlike to be a problem for large shallow foundation although passive resistance of the surrounding soil is disregarded (Tinjum and Christensen, 2010).…”
Section: Geotechnical Design: Worldwidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Biswas and Krishna [11] studied the effect of parameters for soil on horizontal bearing capacity of foundation embedded in nonhomogeneous soil. Based on practical projects, Mohamed and Austrell [12] analysed the effect of vertical loading and parameters for soil on horizontal bearing capacity and deformation for deep-buried foundation and shallow-buried foundation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%