2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1688328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability using high-resolution three-dimensional numerical simulations: The Alpha-Group collaboration

Abstract: The turbulent Rayleigh-Taylor instability is investigated in the limit of strong mode-coupling using a variety of high-resolution, multimode, three dimensional numerical simulations ͑NS͒. The perturbations are initialized with only short wavelength modes so that the self-similar evolution ͑i.e., bubble diameter D b ϰamplitude h b) occurs solely by the nonlinear coupling ͑merger͒ of saturated modes. After an initial transient, it is found that h b ϳ␣ b Agt 2 , where AϭAtwood number, gϭacceleration, and tϭtime. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
385
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(432 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
45
385
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found in numerical studies [26,5]. The RT spike front was found to exhibit similar behavior, h s = α s Agt 2 , where…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similar results were found in numerical studies [26,5]. The RT spike front was found to exhibit similar behavior, h s = α s Agt 2 , where…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Further analysis on the estimation of θ, analogous to Dimonte et al (2004) and Ristorcelli and Clark (2004) methods applied to estimating the growth rate coefficient for Rayleigh-Taylor mixing, is presented below. If we assume that the growth of the Richtmyer-Meshkov mixing layer is modelled by power-law growth with a virtual time offset…”
Section: Growth Of the Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENZO was used here in version 1.0.1, and FLASH was used in version 2.5. FLASH in particular has been extensively tested against laboratory experiments (Calder et al 2002) and other codes (Dimonte et al 2004;Heitmann et al 2005). For the FLASH run of this work, a PPM diffusion parameter of K = 0.1 (Colella & Woodward 1984) was used, whereas for the ENZO run the PPM diffusion parameter was set to K = 0.0.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Numerical Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%