2006
DOI: 10.1134/s0006350906020217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the effects of laser and LED radiation on lipid peroxidation in rat wound fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has also been evidence that coherent and the non-coherent lights produce similar effects in biological tissues. This fact has been demonstrated in several studies [11,16,33,34] in which both types of light produced positive effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There has also been evidence that coherent and the non-coherent lights produce similar effects in biological tissues. This fact has been demonstrated in several studies [11,16,33,34] in which both types of light produced positive effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, the biological effect of these light sources has been evaluated individually in previous studies [11,16,33,34]. Regarding possible differences around coherent light (laser) versus noncoherent light (LED), it has been shown that the coherence of light is not a determinant factor to the clinical effects of low-level lasers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specific resonance and non-resonance photophysical mechanisms have also been discussed in the literature (orientational effect of light, effect of gradient forces, dipole-dipole interactions, thermooptic processes) that are capable of inducing photobiological effects, depending on the polarization and coherence of the radiation [14,[36][37][38][39][50][51][52]. Moreover, a number of data [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] indicate that for comparable dose load, the stimulating effect does not depend on either the coherence of the optical radiation or on its polarization. Furthermore, a widely held opinion is that there is no basis for assuming a possible role for coherence and polarization in the interaction between low-intensity optical radiation and biological systems [53,54].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…catalase, superoxide dismutase, ceruloplasmin (an increase in the anti-oxidant activity of the indicated enzymes, decreased in the pathological state [59,60]); cytochrome c oxidase (acceleration of electron transfer in the respiratory chain as a result of a change in the oxidation-reduction properties of the electron carrier [54]); hemoglobin (an increase in the local concentration of molecular oxygen as a result of photodissociation of oxyhemoglobin; a change in the oxygen-transport function of blood [71,72]; nitrosyl complexes of heme proteins (liberation of NO on exposure to light from the hemoglobin complex and then binding of the NO to cytochrome c oxidase, accompanied by modulation of its activity; vasodilator effect of NO [54,59,60]); molecular oxygen (formation as a result of absorption of photons by O 2 molecules of singlet oxygen, capable of inducing structural rearrangements of the aqueous phase [70]); endogenous porphyrins (uroporphyrins, coproporphyrins, hematoporphyrins) and flavins (photosensitized formation of active forms of oxygen [54,59,60,62]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%