1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(06)80008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the effects of an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, and a β2-agonist, terbutaline, on airway inflammation in newly diagnosed asthma: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
277
1
16

Year Published

1994
1994
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 555 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
14
277
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall effectiveness of the algorithm was demonstrated by the fact that symptoms, b 2 -agonist use and AHR continued to improve during budesonide dose-reduction long after maximal improvement had been achieved in lung function. This suggests the possibility that the initial marked improvement in AHR and lung function may have been associated with a reduction in the amount of inflammatory infiltrate [39], but that later improvement in AHR may have been related to reversal of airway wall remodelling [7] which, in the context of substantially reduced inflammation, may not have required such high budesonide doses. On entry into the study, the subjects demonstrated characteristics of moderate or severe persistent asthma, for which the treatment recommended in international guidelines is high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting b 2 -agonists, with long-term oral corticosteroids also indicated for more than half of the subjects [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall effectiveness of the algorithm was demonstrated by the fact that symptoms, b 2 -agonist use and AHR continued to improve during budesonide dose-reduction long after maximal improvement had been achieved in lung function. This suggests the possibility that the initial marked improvement in AHR and lung function may have been associated with a reduction in the amount of inflammatory infiltrate [39], but that later improvement in AHR may have been related to reversal of airway wall remodelling [7] which, in the context of substantially reduced inflammation, may not have required such high budesonide doses. On entry into the study, the subjects demonstrated characteristics of moderate or severe persistent asthma, for which the treatment recommended in international guidelines is high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting b 2 -agonists, with long-term oral corticosteroids also indicated for more than half of the subjects [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been clearly demonstrated that corticosteroids control genes encoding inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in respiratory epithelial cells (3,7,16,26). Fluticasone propionate (FP) attenuates…”
Section: -Although Staphylococcus Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been clearly demonstrated that corticosteroids control genes encoding inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules in respiratory epithelial cells (3,7,16,26). Fluticasone propionate (FP) attenuates airway epithelial inflammation through its capacity to reduce NF-B deoxyribonucleic binding, activated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation (13), but it is not known whether this is also the case for S. aureus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased numbers of polymorphonuclear cells (mainly eosinophils) and mononuclear cells (mainly lymphocytes) have been identified at autopsy in the airways of patients dying of asthma [1][2][3] and in patients with less severe asthma, by use of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [4][5][6][7] and biopsy of proximal airways [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Immunohistochemical techniques have identified the CD4+ subset of T-lymphocytes in the airways of patients with asthma, and have demonstrated that these lymphocytes and eosinophils express markers of functional activation to a greater extent than those from nonasthmatic subjects [11,12,15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%