1996
DOI: 10.1080/03610919608813348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the finite-sample distribution of some portmanteau tests for univariate time series models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results may be viewed as an indictment of the failure of macroeconomic models to explain the exchange rate to the extent that the innovation variance of the permanent 12 A full description of the estimation strategy can be found in the working paper version of this paper, which is available from the authors upon request. 13 The Monte Carlo simulations of Kwan and Wu (1996) showed that many portmanteau tests for univariate time series, including the Ljung and Box test, have large size distortion when p is chosen to be small. We note that the multiple-timeseries version of our residual diagnostic tests are somewhat sensitive to the choice p, but because the ®nite-sample properties of the test are unknown we choose not to rely exclusively on these results but to combine them with the simulation results below in assessing the adequacy of the speci®cation.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results may be viewed as an indictment of the failure of macroeconomic models to explain the exchange rate to the extent that the innovation variance of the permanent 12 A full description of the estimation strategy can be found in the working paper version of this paper, which is available from the authors upon request. 13 The Monte Carlo simulations of Kwan and Wu (1996) showed that many portmanteau tests for univariate time series, including the Ljung and Box test, have large size distortion when p is chosen to be small. We note that the multiple-timeseries version of our residual diagnostic tests are somewhat sensitive to the choice p, but because the ®nite-sample properties of the test are unknown we choose not to rely exclusively on these results but to combine them with the simulation results below in assessing the adequacy of the speci®cation.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%