1979
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90087-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the phase transitions of phospholipid bilayers and monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
210
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 401 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
17
210
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, ⌬ is inversely proportional to 0 of the phospholipid monolayer, and an extrapolation of ⌬ versus 0 yields c , which specifies an upper limit of 0 that a protein can penetrate (56). The surface pressure of cell membranes and large unilamellar vesicles has been estimated to be 31-35 dynes/cm (63)(64)(65). Thus, for a protein to effectively penetrate a particular cell membrane (or large vesicles), it should have the c value above this range for the monolayer whose lipid composition mimics that of the cell membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, ⌬ is inversely proportional to 0 of the phospholipid monolayer, and an extrapolation of ⌬ versus 0 yields c , which specifies an upper limit of 0 that a protein can penetrate (56). The surface pressure of cell membranes and large unilamellar vesicles has been estimated to be 31-35 dynes/cm (63)(64)(65). Thus, for a protein to effectively penetrate a particular cell membrane (or large vesicles), it should have the c value above this range for the monolayer whose lipid composition mimics that of the cell membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 depicts the crosssectional molecular areas of the various sphingolipids at 30 mN/m in the absence and presence of cholesterol. Data obtained at 30 mN/m were of particular interest because there is much evidence indicating that surface pressures in the 30-35 mN/m range approximate those found in each half of bilayer membranes (Phillips & Chapman, 1968;Demel et al, 1975;Evans & Waugh, 1977;Blume, 1979;Cevc & Marsh, 1987). In Figure 6, each horizontal line corresponds to a different sphingolipid derivative with GalCer derivatives having filled symbols and SMs having unfilled symbols at the ends of their lines.…”
Section: What Effect Does Cholesterol Have On Sphingolipid-packing Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to examine whether the DHE separation into crystalline form in membrane lipids reflects that of cholesterol, force-area isotherms of DHE and cholesterol in POPC monolayers were compared (Table II) at a surface compression of 35 mN/m, in the range of that typical of lipid bilayers (44,50). Increasing the mol % of either DHE or cholesterol in the monolayer reduced the mean molecular area (Å 2 ), due to the condensing effect of sterols on phospholipid membranes.…”
Section: Force-area Isotherms Of Monolayers Formed From Dhe or Cholesmentioning
confidence: 99%