2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of the mechanical strength of chemical vapor-deposited diamond and physical vapor-deposited hard coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16,32] the prenotch was machined straight down in the central part of the sample only, leaving two side walls that formed a precrack when bend-testing thin film samples of silicon oxide, nitride or oxynitride. Testing of small-scale beams containing FIB-premachined notches has been shown in several studies to give K c values near those found for macroscopic samples [15][16][17]26,27]; however, in many other studies, different results, ranging from values slightly to much higher [11,18,19,[21][22][23][24]30,33], or in some cases lower [20,34], than the toughness data from tests on macroscopic specimens of the same material were obtained with FIB-notched specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[16,32] the prenotch was machined straight down in the central part of the sample only, leaving two side walls that formed a precrack when bend-testing thin film samples of silicon oxide, nitride or oxynitride. Testing of small-scale beams containing FIB-premachined notches has been shown in several studies to give K c values near those found for macroscopic samples [15][16][17]26,27]; however, in many other studies, different results, ranging from values slightly to much higher [11,18,19,[21][22][23][24]30,33], or in some cases lower [20,34], than the toughness data from tests on macroscopic specimens of the same material were obtained with FIB-notched specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[12][13][14][15] Figure 4 shows the finite element model used in the numerical simulation. [12][13][14][15] Figure 4 shows the finite element model used in the numerical simulation.…”
Section: B Numerical Simulation For Evaluating Interface Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spontaneous delamination of the coating from the substrate still prior to the beginning of the operation due to considerable compressive stresses is observed in [40], whereas in [41] it is reported about the decrease in the coating-substrate adhesion due to residual compressive stresses in the process of operation. The authors [45,46] also state that due to too high level of residual stresses, coatings become more brittle and their adhesion with the base material loosens. In [28], the beginning of the crack formation in the tool base material is related to the presence of the residual tensile stresses in the surface area of the substrate, added by tensile stresses that occur in the process of the tool operation.…”
Section: Relationship Between Residual Stresses and The Mechanical Chmentioning
confidence: 99%