2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04678-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of the Simulation of Turbulent Ethanol Spray Flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that the approach is able to reproduce the temporal statistics of the flow-field reasonably well. Regarding the scalar statistics of the carrier phase, an underestimation of the flame propagation towards the jet centerline has been revealed, which is similar to the previous observations of [7,46]. Nonetheless, as can be seen from the centerline evolution of the carrier scalars shown in Figure 5, the LES-ESF simulations predict an earlier propagation of the flame towards the center of the spray jet, which comes closer to the experiments than the ATF results shown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It has been demonstrated that the approach is able to reproduce the temporal statistics of the flow-field reasonably well. Regarding the scalar statistics of the carrier phase, an underestimation of the flame propagation towards the jet centerline has been revealed, which is similar to the previous observations of [7,46]. Nonetheless, as can be seen from the centerline evolution of the carrier scalars shown in Figure 5, the LES-ESF simulations predict an earlier propagation of the flame towards the center of the spray jet, which comes closer to the experiments than the ATF results shown.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This can be observed in Figure 4a at the axial positions x = 10D and x = 20D. The results suggest that all simulations are underpredicting the flame propagation towards the jet center, a matter that was observed in our previous work for the ATF model [7] and in the LES shown by Heye et al [46] for the two spray flames EtF2 and EtF6. The possible reasons for this behavior can be divided into two categories: (1) Deviations related to the modeling strategy and (2) uncertainty in boundary conditions (or a combination of both).…”
Section: Flame Characteristics and Carrier Phase Analysissupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations