2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-012-0543-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft and Vein Graft in Myringoplasty

Abstract: To compare the surgical outcome of temporalis fascia graft (TFG) and vein graft (VG) in myringoplasty. This prospective study was carried out over 60 patients with inactive tubotympanic type of chronic suppurative otitis media, with small to moderate size central perforation in Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry from November 2009 to March 2011. Patients were equally randomized into two groups; TFG group and VG group according to the graft material used for myringo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…P.K Parida, S.K Nochikattil (2012). 17 in their study, found 80% uptake rate with temporalis fascia. Quraishi et al (1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…P.K Parida, S.K Nochikattil (2012). 17 in their study, found 80% uptake rate with temporalis fascia. Quraishi et al (1985).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Jain CM (1968) 24 who reports 83.33% success rate with temporalis fascia, Ahad SA (1986) 31 , with 83.30% success with homologous temporalis fascia, Blanshard JD (1990) 41 , 78% take-rate with temporalis fascia in pediatric tympanoplasty. P.K Parida, S.K Nochikattil (2012) 57 in their study found 80% uptake rate with temporalis fascia.…”
Section: Graft Uptake Ratementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Myringoplasty procedure aims at restoring the hearing of patient and decline the complication rate of the disease. 9 Our study aimed at identifying the best method of tympanic membrane defect repair. In this study, the minimum age of the patient was 16 and the maximum was 40, the mean was 27.2 (±6.65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%