2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68133-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Deceptive Review Identification Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, lie detection leverages a spectrum of signals, including speech, facial expressions, and other physiological indicators [3,4]. In the realm of speech-based detection methods, employing psycholinguistic features based on language inquiry has been proposed as an effective means for lie detection [5]. Studies have shown that the pitch, duration, energy, and pauses during speech can provide information on lying [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, lie detection leverages a spectrum of signals, including speech, facial expressions, and other physiological indicators [3,4]. In the realm of speech-based detection methods, employing psycholinguistic features based on language inquiry has been proposed as an effective means for lie detection [5]. Studies have shown that the pitch, duration, energy, and pauses during speech can provide information on lying [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%