A comparative study of strategies for containing the COVID-19 pandemic in Gulf Cooperation Council countries and the European Union

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every aspect of human lives including health, businesses, and lifestyles. In spite of governments implementing various strategies across the globe, the pandemic is still expanding with increasing numbers of positive cases. In addition, countries are reopening and easing lockdown restrictions in order to get their economies back on track, and this has led to an increase in the transmission of novel coronavirus. Therefore, it is essential to regularly review the containment strategies employed in different regions in order to understand the characteristics of COVID-19 transmission and to formulate a future course of actions. Objective The objective of this study is to review the COVID-19 transmission statistics in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and European Union (EU) countries, and to compare these data with the various containment strategies implemented for containing the spread of the virus. Methods A review method was adopted along with different statistical methods for comparing and analyzing COVID-19 data and containment strategies. Transmission types and the Case Fatality Rate (CFR) in the countries in both regions are used to present the current state of the pandemic. In addition, changes in the number of COVID-19 cases are compared with the mitigation and suppression strategies implemented in both regions and their impact is analyzed. Results Countries in the EU were slow in reacting to the pandemic, as delays are observed in the implementation of mitigation strategies. However, suppression strategies were implemented soon after mitigation strategies. GCC countries, on the other hand, were quick to react, and they implemented both mitigation and suppression strategies simultaneously, as soon as the pandemic emerged. The CFR was found to be low among GCC countries compared to EU countries. In addition, a second wave of transmission was observed in the EU, whereas in GCC countries there has been no second wave, although a gradual increase in the number of cases is observed. Community transmission was observed among the majority of countries in both GCC and EU countries. Conclusions With the reopening of markets, the focus of governments should be on developing integrated user-centric preventive strategies, with a blend of awareness creation, motivation, and support.

Travel behaviour changes and risk perception during COVID-19: A case study of Malaysia

“…Both surveys successfully acquired a high number of respondents. Previously, several comparative studies are concentrating on the COVID-19 pandemic, but the majority do not compare two distinct stages of COVID-19 in the same country ( Alanezi et al, 2021 , Hoffman et al, 2021 , Islm et al, 2021 , Novak et al, 2021 ; van den Berg et al, 2022; Vohra et al, 2022 , Wang and Mao, 2021 ). There is a relationship between human mobility and the transmission of contagious diseases since respondents who reported close contact with COVID-19 patients increased during the second survey period.…”

Changes in the Clinical Practice of Mental Health Service Providers Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Questionnaire Study

“…In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, a global pandemic [ 1 ]. Governments around the globe began implementing various strategies to contain the spread of COVID-19 including recommendations for social distancing, restrictions on in-person gatherings and contact, and international travel limitations, among many others [ 2 , 3 ]. In particular, the recommendations for limited interpersonal contact presented mental health service providers with a unique challenge in an attempt to maintain adequate access to services during a time in which mental health care needs were on the rise [ 4 - 7 ].…”

COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Digital Pandemic Surveillance in Germany (eCOV Study): Web Application–Based Prospective Observational Cohort Study

“…It highlighted the potential of digital health solutions to monitor pandemics at a population level with limited resources, offering a viable approach for addressing public health challenges. Amid varying national strategies, vaccination rates, and COVID-19 prevalence, it remains crucial to evaluate pandemic parameters nationally [ 14 - 16 ].…”