2023
DOI: 10.1007/s11831-023-09914-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of State-of-the-art Metaheuristics for Solving Many-objective Optimization Problems of Fixed Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Conceptual Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The proposed MOHA is insensitive to the dimension of MOPs. For benchmark test functions with different numbers of decision variables (30,50) and objectives (3,5), the convergence and diversity of MOHA are significantly better than the comparison algorithms (i.e., MOEA/D, NSGA-III, RVEA, and VaEA) and the computational efficiency is increased by about 5-10 times. Furthermore, MOHA still illustrates good stability and efficiency for large-scale MOPs with decision variables up to 1000 dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) The proposed MOHA is insensitive to the dimension of MOPs. For benchmark test functions with different numbers of decision variables (30,50) and objectives (3,5), the convergence and diversity of MOHA are significantly better than the comparison algorithms (i.e., MOEA/D, NSGA-III, RVEA, and VaEA) and the computational efficiency is increased by about 5-10 times. Furthermore, MOHA still illustrates good stability and efficiency for large-scale MOPs with decision variables up to 1000 dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Multi-objective optimization techniques are widely used in the field of engineering optimization to reduce the budget of design, particularly in aerodynamic shape design [1][2][3]. However, complex aerodynamic shape design is often faced with large-scale design variables and expensive fitness evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While solving complex engineering problems, metaheuristics may have drawbacks such as slow convergence and being trapped in local search domains, resulting in higher computational costs [ 30 ]. To address these limitations, researchers have devised hybridized, modified, and enhanced MHs that incorporate more beneficial attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it entered the era of particle swarm optimization(PSO) [5] and differential evolution (DE) [6], where a large number of algorithms were subsequently developed and utilized. These include: grey wolf optimization algorithm [7], Symbiotic Organism Search Algorithm [8], cuckoo optimization algorithm [9], bat algorithm [10], hungry games search (HGS) algorithm [11], moth-flame optimization algorithm (MFO) [12], chaotic Levy flight distribution (CLFD) algorithm [13], cheetah optimization (CO) algorithm [14], and Henry gas solubility optimization algorithm (HGSO) [15] and so on. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%