2016
DOI: 10.9790/0853-15090197105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Stapled Vs Subcuticular Vs Simple Interrupted Closure of Inguinal Hernia Incision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though, the dehisced wounds eventually healed within 17days postoperatively by mixed intention healing. These findings are in accordance with those of Ghag et al, 35 where the highest number of wound complications occurred in the subcuticular group (46.7% of cases). It had also grade-III infection as a sequel of partial dehiscence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Even though, the dehisced wounds eventually healed within 17days postoperatively by mixed intention healing. These findings are in accordance with those of Ghag et al, 35 where the highest number of wound complications occurred in the subcuticular group (46.7% of cases). It had also grade-III infection as a sequel of partial dehiscence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ghag et al in Mumbai among 90 hernia patients found that the least duration of time was needed to close the skin with a stapler 44.63 sec (±47.23), which was considerable when compared to the subcuticular group's 459.93 sec and the simple interrupted closure's 193.33 sec. 11 Subcuticular stitches required higher time which also shows the same results.…”
Section: Time Required For Skin Closuresupporting
confidence: 67%