2008
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2007.70749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Staff Removal Algorithms

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a quantitative comparison of different algorithms for the removal of stafflines from music images. It contains a survey of previously proposed algorithms and suggests a new skeletonization based approach. We define three different error metrics, compare the algorithms with respect to these metrics and measure their robustness with respect to certain image defects. Our test images are computer-generated scores on which we apply various image deformations typically found in real-worl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, we have used the benchmark test sets provided by Dalitz [13]. This test set includes 32 ideal music images and a set of deformed images generated from the ideal images [12,13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our experiments, we have used the benchmark test sets provided by Dalitz [13]. This test set includes 32 ideal music images and a set of deformed images generated from the ideal images [12,13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test set includes 32 ideal music images and a set of deformed images generated from the ideal images [12,13]. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, we have used the pixel based metric [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once all staff lines are detected, staff line removal is executed to completely remove staff line pixels. In [16], Dalitz et al did a comparative study of staff line removal algorithms, and they divided staff line removal approaches into four main categories: Line Tracking [5,17,18], Vector Field [19], Run length [6,14], Skeletonization [13] (See Table 1). In [20], Carter and Bacon used LAG to segment the image sheet to parts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OMR systems must overcome (Dalitz et al, 2008), since symbol detection and recognition are based on the accuracy of this step. Nevertheless, in a pen-based system the problem is insignificant because the lines in the staff are handled by the system itself and can be removed effortlessly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%