2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40031-020-00498-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Series Compensation, TCPAR and TCSR FACTS Controllers for Mitigation of Congestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Series FACTS controller, TCPAR FACTS Controller, and TCSR FACTS Controller are employed in IEEE 5 Bus system to mitigate congestion. The TCSR FACTS Controller was found most effective in mitigating congestion [13]. A generalized unified power flow controller (GUPFC) and interline power flow controller (IPFC) are implemented for N-1 contingency case applying constant P, Q load model, and ZIP load model for the power system [14].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Series FACTS controller, TCPAR FACTS Controller, and TCSR FACTS Controller are employed in IEEE 5 Bus system to mitigate congestion. The TCSR FACTS Controller was found most effective in mitigating congestion [13]. A generalized unified power flow controller (GUPFC) and interline power flow controller (IPFC) are implemented for N-1 contingency case applying constant P, Q load model, and ZIP load model for the power system [14].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%