2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Predictive Approaches for Load Forecasting in Smart Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The random forest (RF) ensemble technique combines independent learners to improve the overall model forecasting ability. The research presented in Reference [30] took advantage of this principle to forecast the day-ahead hourly consumption in office buildings. They used many ensemble algorithms, with RF being one of them, including environmental variables such as temperature and humidity and lagged load records to improve the results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The random forest (RF) ensemble technique combines independent learners to improve the overall model forecasting ability. The research presented in Reference [30] took advantage of this principle to forecast the day-ahead hourly consumption in office buildings. They used many ensemble algorithms, with RF being one of them, including environmental variables such as temperature and humidity and lagged load records to improve the results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its recent development, XGB is not a matured STLF method [16]. Nevertheless, researchers are starting to use it, showing outstanding performances against traditional methods [29,30].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparative study of load forecasting approaches using three different methods for occupancy prediction and context-driven control of a smart building's appliances was reported by S. Hadri et.al. (2019) [4]. The proposed methods were ARIMA and SARIMA, which were based on statistical method, while XGBoost and Random Forest (RF) are based on machine learning method and LSTM is based on deep learning method.…”
Section: Hung Nguyen Et Al (2017)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [11] doing traffic flow forecasting for one day using the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) method is very effective with a MAPE error rate of 0.097%. XGBoost also produces the best forecast and fast execution times than several other methods such as ARIMA, SARIMA, and Random Forest in load forecasting [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%