1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-8947(98)00125-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of phase Doppler and laser diffraction techniques to investigate drop sizes in annular two-phase flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The various approaches utilized to estimate the size of the bubble are laser diffraction, phase Doppler techniques and sonoluminescence (Burdin et al 1999;Chen et al 2002;Iida et al 2010a, b;Lee et al 2005). Laser diffraction and the phase Doppler method are based on the measurement of the scattered laser light from the bubbles (Zaidi et al 1998). In sonoluminescence method, the bubble size as a function of the light emitted during the collapse of the microbubbles is monitored (i.e., sonoluminescence).…”
Section: The Size and The Distribution Of Microbubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various approaches utilized to estimate the size of the bubble are laser diffraction, phase Doppler techniques and sonoluminescence (Burdin et al 1999;Chen et al 2002;Iida et al 2010a, b;Lee et al 2005). Laser diffraction and the phase Doppler method are based on the measurement of the scattered laser light from the bubbles (Zaidi et al 1998). In sonoluminescence method, the bubble size as a function of the light emitted during the collapse of the microbubbles is monitored (i.e., sonoluminescence).…”
Section: The Size and The Distribution Of Microbubblesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 It is capable of simultaneously measuring the particle diameter, velocity, and mass flux of spray droplets. 13 Because of the high spatial resolution and ease of use, spray characterization using PDA systems has found widespread application. 14,15 In early systems, the two best-known sources of error have been Gaussian beam effects and slit effects.…”
Section: Pda Measurement Of Spray Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coleman et al (1991) found that the unadjusted-entraineddroplet model tended to offer a better match with low-pressure gas wells. Later, Nosseir et al (1997), Li et al (2002), Zhou and Yuan (2010), and Zhibin et al (2011) considered the effects of flow regime, droplet deformation, and liquid amount in the gas stream on the critical gas velocity, and each presented various new entrained-droplet models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%