2018 Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iccmc.2018.8487931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Outranking MADM Algorithms in Network Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While preference value is determined based on the opinion of decision maker, in this study, is bus terminal authority. This is the benefit of Simple Additive Weighting Method that has capability to determine preference value from highest value to lowest value and make decision maker easy to choose alternatives with priority to be implemented [12][13][14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While preference value is determined based on the opinion of decision maker, in this study, is bus terminal authority. This is the benefit of Simple Additive Weighting Method that has capability to determine preference value from highest value to lowest value and make decision maker easy to choose alternatives with priority to be implemented [12][13][14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network selection plays a fundamental role in the provision of stable connections with an adequate level of QoS and hence network operators and providers commonly exploit several advanced techniques to select the best AP to allocate new connections. Among the various techniques proposed in the literature, Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM), proved to be one of the most flexible solutions to capture user preferences and QoE related aspects in the decision process [3]- [7]. In MADM solutions, the information characterizing the decision making is made by the so-called attribute values and attribute weights: the first ones describing characteristics, qualities and performances of different alternatives, whereas the latter ones are used to measure the relevance of attributes.…”
Section: State Of the Art Innovations And Limitations Of The Proposed...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is advised to utilize several simulations of the decision matrix's element estimates within a given error while determining the ranks of alternatives in order to acquire statistical estimates of the ranks. Anupamaet al [3] in 2015 compared three MADM approaches SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), WPM (Weighted Product Method), and PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations) in this research for their effectiveness in network selection. Zavadskas and Turskis [4] in their work try to use ARAS method over microclimate in office room.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%