2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of nanosized iron oxide particles; magnetite (Fe3O4), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) and hematite (α-Fe2O3), using ferromagnetic resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in the literature, a high temperature is commonly used for demagnetization [21]. Demagnetization of Fe 3 O 4 (α-Fe 2 O 3 ) was obtained by heating Fe 3 O 4 particles up to 500 °C (under air atmosphere) to improve the dispersion of Fe 3 O 4 in the PBMA matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As reported in the literature, a high temperature is commonly used for demagnetization [21]. Demagnetization of Fe 3 O 4 (α-Fe 2 O 3 ) was obtained by heating Fe 3 O 4 particles up to 500 °C (under air atmosphere) to improve the dispersion of Fe 3 O 4 in the PBMA matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the dispersion state of particles in the matrix and the interactions between particles and the matrix are very important for damping properties of composites. To improve the dispersion of Fe 3 O 4 in the PBMA matrix, Fe 3 O 4 particles of demagnetization were prepared in high temperatures [20,21]. Moreover, to study the effect of fillers-matrixes interactions on the damping properties of PBMA, Fe 3 O 4 and graphene/Fe 3 O 4 hybrid particles were incorporated into PBMA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequencies of the two peaks for the BaFe 11.4 Ti 0.6 O 19 , BaFe 11.3 Ti 0.7 O 19 and BaFe 11.2 Ti 0.8 O 19 samples are (31.69 GHz, 36.08 GHz), (30.25 GHz, 34.40 GHz) and (29.39 GHz, 33.53 GHz), respectively. As is known, the Landé factor g for Fe 3+ ions is 2.0 and it is around 3.4 for localized Fe 2+ ions [20, 35], while the exchange coupling between Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ gives a g factor that is greater than 2.0 [20]. According to equation (2), the two values of g can be obtained based on the resonance frequency revealed by the two peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a new natural resonance with respect to the exchange coupling between Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ ions will appear in the ferrite, but the resonant frequency will be different from that related to the Fe 3+ ions. This implies that if the exchange coupling occurs in the ferrite, a new resonance peak and thus a new magnetic loss peak are expected to appear at another frequency position resulting from the Fe 3+ ions [19, 20]. Therefore, double natural resonance peaks will be generated simultaneously in the ferrite in this case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other difference is the crystal structures. While α-Fe 2 O 3 has a rhombohedral crystal structure, γ-Fe 2 O 3 has cubic cells (Randrianantoandro et al 2001; Can et al 2012). Fe 2 O 3 NPs can be used as an adsorbent in the removal of metals from aqueous solutions (Grover et al 2012; Ge et al 2012; Gonzalez et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%