2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of mode I delamination behavior of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced polymers with epoxy and polyurethane matrices using two methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one should note that a limited difference between the values of G and J is expected based on the information available in the literature. Fracture energies obtained through LEFM or the J-integral method differed by no more than 5% in glass/epoxy composites in the case of large scale fiber bridging [36]. Moreover, assuming the value of J-integral very close to G Ic did not impose a significant error on deriving a cohesive law and then in simulating delamination growth with finite element models in glass/epoxy composites similar to the one being studied here [37].…”
Section: Test Method Data Acquisition and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, one should note that a limited difference between the values of G and J is expected based on the information available in the literature. Fracture energies obtained through LEFM or the J-integral method differed by no more than 5% in glass/epoxy composites in the case of large scale fiber bridging [36]. Moreover, assuming the value of J-integral very close to G Ic did not impose a significant error on deriving a cohesive law and then in simulating delamination growth with finite element models in glass/epoxy composites similar to the one being studied here [37].…”
Section: Test Method Data Acquisition and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The epoxy resin belongs to a class of thermosetting polymers that undergo cross linking when polymerized in the presence of a hardener (cross linker). The matrix material was prepared with ixture of the epoxy resin and hardener in the volume ratio of 2:1 [26].…”
Section: Moisture Absorption Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following ASTM D3039 / D3039M-00 (2006) method, [30]. Traction strength of dog bone shape specimens of 140 to 35 to 10 mm was performed using the standard ultimate testing machine (UTM), Shimadzu (Model AG-1) with 20 mm/min cross head speed [17,26].…”
Section: Tensile Strength Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyurethane is a low cost, high performance polymer, whose durability contributes significantly to the long lifetimes of many products. In recent years, PU has been increasingly used as a reinforcement material for composites because of its excellent mechanical properties and fast reaction times . Weather resistance is important for PUs used in outdoor applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, PU has been increasingly used as a reinforcement material for composites because of its excellent mechanical properties and fast reaction times. 2,3 Weather resistance is important for PUs used in outdoor applications. Polyurethane composites are used in composite profiles in structural applications 4 (eg, in trams, trains and buses as outdoor roofs and side covers), and also in construction (eg, windows) or as reinforcements for structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%