2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2017.8257991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of matrix factorization and random walk with restart in recommender systems

Abstract: Between matrix factorization or Random Walk with Restart (RWR), which method works better for recommender systems? Which method handles explicit or implicit feedback data better? Does additional information help recommendation? Recommender systems play an important role in many ecommerce services such as Amazon and Netflix to recommend new items to a user. Among various recommendation strategies, collaborative filtering has shown good performance by using rating patterns of users. Matrix factorization and rand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition matrix is defined based on the used graph structure. The value of restarting probability (β) is considered to be 0.2 [43]. For each user u a , the relevance scores of unvisited locations m j , j = 1, 2, ..., M are obtained as:…”
Section: Group Recommendations By the Rwr Under Aggregated Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition matrix is defined based on the used graph structure. The value of restarting probability (β) is considered to be 0.2 [43]. For each user u a , the relevance scores of unvisited locations m j , j = 1, 2, ..., M are obtained as:…”
Section: Group Recommendations By the Rwr Under Aggregated Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are more complex and time-consuming. Furthermore, most of the recent model-based CF methods [11], [16] focus on adding additional domain information including context, time and location to improve the accuracy of QoS prediction. Although such additional information can improve the predicting accuracy, those models all use simple random sampling method to obtain training data from the original datasets, which makes the training data biased and leads to poor prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among numerous methods [9,15,17] to measure the similarity, random walk with restart (RWR) [17] has aroused considerable attention due to its ability to account for the global network structure from a particular user's point of view. RWR has been widely used in various applications across different domains including ranking, link prediction [11], and recommendation [18]. To avoid expensive costs incurred by RWR computation, various methods have been proposed to calculate RWR scores efficiently, and the majority of them have focused on static graphs [12-14, 19, 23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%