2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ssci.2018.8628930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Credit Card Fraud Detection Based on Time Variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 3, a comparison analysis was conducted between the algorithms proposed in this research and existing ML-based credit card fraud detection frameworks. The results showed that the XGB-AdaBoost and the ET-AdaBoost achieved fraud detection ACs that are 5.08% higher than the RF presented in [11] and 6.78% higher than the KNN presented in [11]. In comparison to the work presented in [13], the XGB-AdaBoost obtained an AC that is 8.74% higher.…”
Section: F Experiments Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 3, a comparison analysis was conducted between the algorithms proposed in this research and existing ML-based credit card fraud detection frameworks. The results showed that the XGB-AdaBoost and the ET-AdaBoost achieved fraud detection ACs that are 5.08% higher than the RF presented in [11] and 6.78% higher than the KNN presented in [11]. In comparison to the work presented in [13], the XGB-AdaBoost obtained an AC that is 8.74% higher.…”
Section: F Experiments Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Rajora et al [11] conducted a comparative research of ML methods for credit card fraud detection using the European cardholders dataset. Some of the methods that were investigated include the RF and the kNN methods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parallel investigation of machine learning approaches for the problems of fraudulent activity detection with credit cards was performed by Rajora et al [50] on the European cardholders dataset. Noteworthy utilized methods from the work are k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and random forest (RF).…”
Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagging consists of a group of "weak learners" to form "strong learners" and uses majority voting to identify the predicted class by selecting the class with the highest vote assigned by the base learners. [19][20][21] The researcher conducted experiments on the credit card fraud dataset (CCFD) and investigated the performance of these classifiers through recall, precision, and precision-recall curve (PRC) area rates; PRC was chosen as the main indicator for the study. PRC measures the overall ability to distinguish between binary classes to predict whether a transaction is normal or fraudulent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%