The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2010.5596677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of machine learning techniques in blog comments spam filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy (%) F-measure The best results available in the literature KL-divergence [2] 83.00 -SMO [3] 84.61 -C4.5 [4] 86.00 0.890 C4.5 auto-supervised [4] 71.58 0.825 The best results presented in this paper SVM-P (metadata) -balanced 97. The results indicated that, in general, the evaluated techniques achieved good performance, regardless of the used attribute.…”
Section: Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accuracy (%) F-measure The best results available in the literature KL-divergence [2] 83.00 -SMO [3] 84.61 -C4.5 [4] 86.00 0.890 C4.5 auto-supervised [4] 71.58 0.825 The best results presented in this paper SVM-P (metadata) -balanced 97. The results indicated that, in general, the evaluated techniques achieved good performance, regardless of the used attribute.…”
Section: Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It aims to verify the presence of links that may take to undesired pages. The authors also created the first public blog spam database that has been used in later studies [1], [3], [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More time might be needed as in the worst case, all data points might take point in decision. [13]. c) DT: Decision tree is a simple structure where non-leaf nodes represent the conditional tests of attributes or features and leaf nodes contain the class label in which each data predicted into.Tree-shaped structures that rep-resent sets of decisions.…”
Section: A Various Algorithms For Filtering Text Spam 1) Emails A) Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As spam has different types, various methods have been proposed for detecting and filtering them. Authors in performed a study on machine learning techniques for spam filtering in blog comments. Thus, they compared four famous machine learning techniques: Naïve Bayes, K‐nearest neighbor, neural networks, and Support Vector Machines.…”
Section: Alternatives To Captchasmentioning
confidence: 99%