Proceedings of the XXXVIII Iberian Latin American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering 2017
DOI: 10.20906/cps/cilamce2017-0937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of local and global preconditioners for finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the inverse of A i is non-computable and thus the error is never known. Hence, as in iterative methods for solving a system of linear equations, we select a preconditioner to mimic the inverse operator and thus decrease the condition number of the system [39]. Thus, we define the loss as…”
Section: Norm Selection: Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the inverse of A i is non-computable and thus the error is never known. Hence, as in iterative methods for solving a system of linear equations, we select a preconditioner to mimic the inverse operator and thus decrease the condition number of the system [39]. Thus, we define the loss as…”
Section: Norm Selection: Preconditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%