2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-017-6640-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence, logistic regression and support vector machine and evaluated by SBAS-InSAR monitoring: Zhouqu to Wudu segment in Bailong River Basin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…into the training and testing datasets) may be another influential factor. This ratio was determined as 80:20 and 70:30 in the present study and (Xie et al 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…into the training and testing datasets) may be another influential factor. This ratio was determined as 80:20 and 70:30 in the present study and (Xie et al 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, in comparison with the studies that used the same methods for the landslide susceptibility mapping in different areas, it was revealed that the main results of this study are more accurate. In Xie et al (2017), for instance, they used ANFIS-PSO, ANFIS-DE, and ANFIS-GA for landslide hazard assessment in Hanyuan County of China. In term of AUROC, the ANFIS-DE was found the best model with 0.844, followed by ANFIS-GA with 0.821, and ANFIS-PSO with 0.780.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical approaches are quantitative methods which can use different functional relationship. They can be subdivided into: (1) physically-based methods [10,11]; and (2) traditional statistical methods, such as the frequency ratio [12,13], evidential belief function [14,15], weight of evidence [16,17], discriminant analysis [18][19][20][21], and logistic regression [22,23], (3) advanced data mining technologies, such as artificial neural networks [24,25], support vector machines [26][27][28], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems [29,30], alternating decision trees [31], and functional trees [32,33]. These methods need landslide inventories expressed as landslide density maps to produce functional relationships with causative factors [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%