2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of integration algorithms for finite single crystal (visco-)plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean-field homogenization scheme is applied to study the effect of martensite inclusions embedded in single-crystalline austensite. To this end, a recently investigated single-crystal plasticity model [6] is adopted in the constitutive description of the individual phases. In particular, in the face-centered cubic austenite the plastic slip is considered on the primary octahedral {111} 110 slip systems, whereas in the body-centered cubic martensite the {110} 111 and the {112} 111 families of slip systems are included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean-field homogenization scheme is applied to study the effect of martensite inclusions embedded in single-crystalline austensite. To this end, a recently investigated single-crystal plasticity model [6] is adopted in the constitutive description of the individual phases. In particular, in the face-centered cubic austenite the plastic slip is considered on the primary octahedral {111} 110 slip systems, whereas in the body-centered cubic martensite the {110} 111 and the {112} 111 families of slip systems are included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…$$ The reader is referred to Reference 7 for more details regarding the augmented Lagrangian approach to the crystal plasticity problem analogous to the present one. The augmented Lagrangian approach also proved useful in other algorithms for crystal plasticity, compare Reference 35.…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the pseudo‐inverse or generalized inverse methods can be used 27,28,30 . Subsequently, other algorithms have been developed, compare References 31‐37 and the references therein. The closest to the present article are the works based on the incremental energy minimization, 6,7,21,38‐47 but they require existence of an incremental potential, which is a separate assumption in the general case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Akpama et al, 44 a replacement of the nonsmooth Kuhn–Tucker conditions with a system of semismooth Fischer–Burmeister complementary functions is also presented. Recently, Prüger and Kiefer 47 have reviewed several formulations in detail and assessed their behavior for nonmonotonous loading scenarios and anisotropic hardening relations. A formulation for small strain single crystal plasticity in the context of an infeasible primal‐dual interior‐point method was proposed by Scheunemann et al 48 A different strategy for the computation of the slip rates consists in adopting a rate‐dependent regularization presented in Peirce et al, 49 Asaro and Needleman 50 and Cuitino and Ortiz, 13 which compute the slip rates with a power law‐type equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%