2019
DOI: 10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_49_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of human and animal hairs: Microscopic hair comparison and cytochrome c oxidase I species identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imbricate cuticle scale patterns were detected in large ruminants, goat, and horse hairs. This type is also observed in the same animals (except large ruminant) but of the scalp's hair (Cortellini et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Imbricate cuticle scale patterns were detected in large ruminants, goat, and horse hairs. This type is also observed in the same animals (except large ruminant) but of the scalp's hair (Cortellini et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Furthermore, the morphology of hairs can be used to identify the human gender, age, and hair pigmentation (Ali et al, 2015). Kshirsagar et al (2009) and Cortellini et al (2019) documented the comparison between human and animal hairs. This comparison is helpful to recognize physical contact with a suspect and crime scene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tridico (2005) applied the comparative microscopic examination of animals hair in forensic science. Moreover, hair morphology is used as a tool for recognition of buffalo, camel, cow, horse, donkey, sheep, goat, dog, and cat (Ahmed, Ali, & Ghallab, 2018), identification of the wild animal species (Bhat, Shrivastav, Dar, & Bari, 2014), and differentiate human hair from animal hair (Cortellini, Carobbio, Brescia, Cerri, & Verzeletti, 2019; Kshirsagar, Singh, & Fulari, 2009). Furthermore, Meyer and Neurand (1987), and Meyer, Schwarz, and Neurand (1978) efficiently demonstrated species‐specific differences in the skin of domestic mammals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species identification can be successfully established through the use of many of these approaches using incomplete bone samples. More specifically, molecular identification (Holland and Parsons, 1999;Moore and Frazier, 2019;Pereira et al, 2019), macroscopic identification (Corrieri and Márquez-Grant, 2019), microscopic identification (Nganvongpanit et al, 2015;Cummaudo et al, 2018;Cortellini et al, 2019;Cummaudo et al, 2019) and/or elemental composition (Nganvongpanit et al, 2016c;Nganvongpanit et al, 2017b) can all be achieved with incomplete specimens. However, each approach is associated with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%