2000
DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2000.1321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of High-Accuracy Frequency Estimation Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they share several drawbacks, namely aliasing, resolution bias error or picket-fence eect and leakage [23]. On the other hand, with a slight increase in the computational cost, a parametric method is able to obtain high-accuracy frequency estimates working with a relatively short data set [24]. Among these parametric methods the Prony's method is a good compromise between accuracy and computational eort.…”
Section: Is a Stationary Process (Where D Is A Nonnegativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they share several drawbacks, namely aliasing, resolution bias error or picket-fence eect and leakage [23]. On the other hand, with a slight increase in the computational cost, a parametric method is able to obtain high-accuracy frequency estimates working with a relatively short data set [24]. Among these parametric methods the Prony's method is a good compromise between accuracy and computational eort.…”
Section: Is a Stationary Process (Where D Is A Nonnegativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an algorithm that is applicable for adding any symmetrical window function, and notably has noise immunity. 15 Despite the above features, different disadvantages of the above algorithms cannot be avoided, especially when random noise is present in the signal spectrum of mechanical failure, resulting in the low accuracy of their estimates. [16][17][18] The noise will also seriously affect the accuracy of the spectrum estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified linear model is adopted due to the complexity of the comprehensive complex-valued model. Based on the quantitative relationship between the phases resulting from the DFTs of the original signal and the shifted signal with the same or different length, the phase-difference-based method is initially proposed only for estimating the frequency of a monochromatic signal [24][25][26], and is fully developed afterwards [5,27]; it requires calculation of DFT twice. From different points of view, similar ideas are explored by Danthez [3] and Dai [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%