2008
DOI: 10.1080/13647830701642227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of H2-air premixed flame in micro combustors with different physical and boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the mesh size of 17 µm (mesh-2, 354×36 cells) is determined to be the maximum-sized mesh that can provide grid-independent solutions. This value is found to be slightly lower than many of the mesh densities used in the literature [48,56,62,68,71,75,80] (ranging from 19 to values larger than 50 µm). Since only a few of the past studies used the GCI method, visual observations of the solutions might have a less strict requirement on grid refinement.…”
Section: Grid Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the mesh size of 17 µm (mesh-2, 354×36 cells) is determined to be the maximum-sized mesh that can provide grid-independent solutions. This value is found to be slightly lower than many of the mesh densities used in the literature [48,56,62,68,71,75,80] (ranging from 19 to values larger than 50 µm). Since only a few of the past studies used the GCI method, visual observations of the solutions might have a less strict requirement on grid refinement.…”
Section: Grid Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…When a particular species data was not available, Sutherland's three coefficient law (based on kinetic theory) [84] was used to calculate transport properties. It should be noted that other studies [56,61,62,68,71,80] have incorporated the CHEMKIN code [85] to evaluate the thermodynamic and transport properties for each species. CHEMKIN used essentially the same thermodynamic database and only a slightly different fitting procedure from the CEA code by Gordon and McBride [83].…”
Section: Numerical Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations