2020
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1781301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of estimating solar radiation using machine learning approaches: DL, SMGRT, and ANFIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ANFIS model is one of the most efficient AI methods that has been used in both simple and hybridized forms for hydrological and meteorological modeling. ANFIS model showed its acceptable performances in solar radiation estimation (Üstün et al 38 ; Halabi et al 34 ; Khosravi et al 39 ), pan evaporation estimation (Adnan et al 40 ; Guven and Kisi 41 ), drought forecasting (Aghelpour et al 42 ; Aghelpour et al 43 ; Aghelpour et al 44 ; Kisi et al 45 ), river flow modeling (Mohammadi et al 46 ; Aghelpour et al 47 ), rainfall forecasting (Mekanik et al 48 ; Yaseen et al 49 ), and wind speed forecasting (Maroufpoor et al 50 ). However, they are less used in evapotranspiration prediction for the future (most of the studied cases have used the ANFIS model for ET0 “estimation,” not “prediction” for the future).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ANFIS model is one of the most efficient AI methods that has been used in both simple and hybridized forms for hydrological and meteorological modeling. ANFIS model showed its acceptable performances in solar radiation estimation (Üstün et al 38 ; Halabi et al 34 ; Khosravi et al 39 ), pan evaporation estimation (Adnan et al 40 ; Guven and Kisi 41 ), drought forecasting (Aghelpour et al 42 ; Aghelpour et al 43 ; Aghelpour et al 44 ; Kisi et al 45 ), river flow modeling (Mohammadi et al 46 ; Aghelpour et al 47 ), rainfall forecasting (Mekanik et al 48 ; Yaseen et al 49 ), and wind speed forecasting (Maroufpoor et al 50 ). However, they are less used in evapotranspiration prediction for the future (most of the studied cases have used the ANFIS model for ET0 “estimation,” not “prediction” for the future).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… [ 82 ] Isparta, Türkiye DL, SMGRT, and ANFIS Soil, and air temperature sunshine duration, relative humidity, cloudiness, and extraterrestrial solar radiation Monthly global solar radiation 2007 to 2016 MBE, MSE, RMSE, and R 2 Each model presented very satisfied results in predicting the GSR, but SMGRT comes to the fore according to the statistical metrics. [ 83 ] Tuscaloosa, Alabama in the USA ANN, and RNN Wind speed, dew-point temperature, outdoor air-dry bulb temperature, relative humidity, and wind direction Daily global solar radiation January 14, 2019, to January 21, 2019 RMSE, NMBE CV(RMSE), and R 2 Cloud cover was a vital effect on the prediction of GSR. RNN had better prediction results, but it had 800 times higher computational costs than ANN.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The input parameters were wind speed, temperature, pressure, and humidity; statistically, the gaussian model performed better. Various machine learning algorithms based on linear and nonlinear regression approaches were also examined [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%