A comparative study of electronic stethoscopes for cardiac auscultation

Abstract

There are several electronic stethoscopes available on the market today, with a very high potential for healthcare namely telemedicine, assisted decision and education. However, there are no recent comparatives studies published about the recording quality of auscultation sounds. In this study we aim to: a) define a ranking, according to experts opinion of 6 of the most relevant electronic stethoscopes on the market today; b) verify if there are any relations between a stethoscope's performance and the type of pathology present; c) analyze if some pathologies are more easily identified than others when using electronic auscultation. Our methodology consisted in creating two study groups: the first group included 18 cardiologists and cardiology house officers, acting as the gold standard of this work. The second included 30 medical students. Using a database of heart sounds recorded in real hospital environments, we applied questionnaires to observers from each group. The first group listened to 60 cardiac auscultations recorded by the 6 stethoscopes, and each one was asked to identify the pathological sound present: aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation or normal. The second group was asked to choose, between two auscultation recordings, using as criteria the best sound quality for the identification of pathological sounds. Results include a total of 1080 evaluations, in which 72% of cases were correctly diagnosed. A detailed breakdown of these results is presented in this paper. As conclusions, results showed that the impact of the differences between stethoscopes is very small, given that we did not find statistically significant differences between all pairs of stethoscopes. Normal sounds showed to be easier to identify than pathological sounds, but we did not find differences between stethoscopes in this identification.

Wearable Cardiorespiratory Monitoring Employing a Multimodal Digital Patch Stethoscope: Estimation of ECG, PEP, LVET and Respiration Using a 55 mm Single-Lead ECG and Phonocardiogram

“…While stethoscope auscultation is a valuable and oftentimes first applied tool in primary health care, its digitization is a relatively recent development leading to applications including classification of mitral valve prolapse [23] and the detection of other abnormal heart sounds [24]. Currently available digital stethoscopes are designed close to the traditional implementation [25], with a few exceptions lately emerging [26]. To the best knowledge of the authors, no wearable digital stethoscope implementation was available until very recently.…”

A novel multi-branch architecture for state of the art robust detection of pathological phonocardiograms

“…The design of CAD systems for heart sound signals analysis with good sensitivity and specificity for abnormal heart sounds poses some non-trivial challenges. The analysis starts from the acquisition and digitalization of the heart recordings into a digital phonocardiogram (PCG), which is usually performed with an electronic stethoscope [8]. The bandwidth necessary to convey clinically relevant information ranges from as low as 20 Hz to 650 Hz [9,10].…”

Wearable Bluetooth Triage Healthcare Monitoring System

“…However, their high cost which can range from several hundred to several thousand AUD make them less suitable for use in ED, where contamination and damage can easily occur [18]. A study by Pinto, et al [19] also concluded that whilst features may vary between leading market ES, their performance were similar, showing advanced features are not essential for effective use in triage assessment. A low cost specifically triage assessment design, is, therefore, more desirable than the implementation of costly electronic stethoscopes marketed towards specialist practitioners.…”