2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/263/6/062038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of electrochemical machining process parameters by using GA and Taguchi method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, during machining, the surface quality of the component is one of the major constraints for the selection of machining equipment as well as machining parameters. Due to this, numerous research publication has been observed in the analysis and optimization of machining process parameters during the machining of composites [33,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, during machining, the surface quality of the component is one of the major constraints for the selection of machining equipment as well as machining parameters. Due to this, numerous research publication has been observed in the analysis and optimization of machining process parameters during the machining of composites [33,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Konsentrasi elektrolit yang rendah dapat mengurangi celah pemesinan dan memberikan hasil akhir kekasaran permukaan yang lebih baik. Suhu elektrolit yang rendah juga mendorong permukaan yang lebih baik (Soni & Thomas, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The machinability of composites primarily depends on numerous parameters such as type of machine, cutting tool, machining process parameters, reinforcement type, weight % of reinforcement, size of the reinforcing particles, distribution of reinforcements, cutting fluid and type of coolant [12,15,16,18,19]. Nearly one-fourth of the total machining cost is accompanying the machining tool, and one-fifth machine downtime happens owing to the failure of the cutting tool [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%