2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6407-6_66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Different Deep Learning Architectures for Benign-Malignant Mass Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, its configuration and tuning are a hard and lengthy process. Optimizing the deep learning architecture parameters requires too many experiments running for long periods to set the optimal settings [ 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, its configuration and tuning are a hard and lengthy process. Optimizing the deep learning architecture parameters requires too many experiments running for long periods to set the optimal settings [ 45 , 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, optimizing DL architecture parameters requires plenty of experiments using deep learning networks and architecture combinations. The dataset utilized in this work is small and is not enough to adopt a deep learning approach [ 15 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ]. The results section compares the proposed technique for verification and performance evaluation against recent deep learning architectures with different deep neural networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ting et al [26] proposed to extract hierarchical features from a custom CNN and used a set of images from the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) [27]. Kulkarni et al [28] comparatively studied different DL architectures for mass classification by using 200 mass images from DDSM. Li et al [29] proposed a two-view mammogram images classification model composed of two branches of CNNs for feature extraction and two modified ResNets for feature fusion on images from DDSM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%